Navigation
  
  About Us
  Business
  Calendar
  Catalogs
  Churches
  Classical Arts
  Classifieds
  Columnists
  Community
  Announcements
  Editorials
  Feedback
  Festivals
  Fun Things 
  To Do
  Governments
  Gwinnett 
  Delegation
  Letters
  Museums
  Performances
  Rezoning
  Sailing
  Sports
  Travel
  UPCCA
  Volunteer

 

 

 

Man   Behind
the Badge

by Stan Hall

HallST@co.gwinnett.ga.us 

A Call (Or Recall) To Arms

   I have never met a conservative who did not support the constitutional rights that we, as Americans, have to bear arms. In fact, most conservatives will tell you very quickly that the right to bear arms is one of the foundations of our Constitution and it is just as important as any of our guaranteed rights. 

   This right has proved very beneficial on many documented cases when our forefathers were called to defend themselves from everything from tyranny to carpetbaggers and many other threats that were thwarted by fast moving projectiles from the muzzle of a gun. 

   Our country's history is steeped deeply in the fact that every American has the right to protect themselves, their family, and their homes. This defense has been most often performed by the use of a firearm. I am one of those conservatives that truly believe everything that I have alluded to thus far. If you are waiting for the "however" part; well here it comes! 

   Personally, I find myself in a position whereby I eschew anything that has to do with the weakening of the rights concerning firearm possession. On the other hand, I have been involved professionally as a law enforcement person who is sworn to do everything possible to protect life and property. An interesting dilemma; don't you think? Is it possible to stand by the principles of your political beliefs and also believe in something that will be beneficial in your sworn duty at the same time? My Libertarian friends would answer that question with a very loud "no." My liberal friends (I do actually have some) would answer just as quickly with, "of course." Libertarians would like to see all waiting periods repealed, as well as, to do away with anything that prohibits an individual to carry a concealed firearm. Liberals think that we should extend the waiting period and that, most often; no one ever needs to carry a concealed weapon. 

   Personally, I find myself somewhere in the middle of all of them. But professionally, I have come to a conclusion that will probably make segments of both groups, not to mention my conservative friends upset. I cannot imagine a reason where there would be a need for a citizen to possess an assault type weapon. These weapons are not even issued to police officers with the exception of specialized units. But, now we have armed robberies, home invasions, and assaults on police officers during the commission of a crime where assault weapons are commonplace. It seems absurd that criminals are showing up better armed than police officers whose job it is to protect the public. It is no longer uncommon for police officers to find themselves in a scenario where their body armor will not even stop the ammunition that is being fired on them. Quite frankly, when someone buys an assault weapon, it should be assumed that it will be used for some type of an assault. Many gun enthusiasts will dispute this by countering that they maybe for assaults fro some, for them the weapons are for competitive shooting, collector series, and all of the other reasons that may be legitimate. Despite these legitimate reasons, the majority of these weapons are being used to kill people in a violent act. They are causing law enforcement agencies all over this country to upgrade their arsenals simply to be competitive with the bad guys. 

   This problem has led to many law enforcement executives leading the cause to prevent the ownership of assault weapons from being sold across the counter. It is not a position that they take lightly, but has become a position that they are forced to support based on the past and potential tragedies that have and will be caused by these weapons in the hands of thugs. It may go against constitutional merit, but stands tall in the common sense department. 

   Every person in this country should have the right to bear arms. Every hunter in this country should have the right to bear arms; as many as they like. Every person in this country should have the right to use these weapons in an act of self-defense or protection of their properties. I would never argue these premises. However, in the atmosphere that we find ourselves in, where one horrific act of violence is topped by the next, we have to do something. Policies that would keep assault type weapons off of the streets and out of the hands of those intent on creating a chaotic is something that I feel necessary to support. Maybe this is a case where the personal and protective rights of the many have to override the rights of the few. It is not a perfect science or formula but what in this world is anymore? 


For further information, visit www.voice4victims.com  

If you are interested in having Mr. Hall speak at your next club or group meeting, please email contact information to: SHall BadgeNotes@aol.com 

030404

Archives


E-mail: weeklypub1@comcast.net

powered by:
Dragonfly Servers Network

Back to Top